SCODiA Report by MLBI Lab

Single-Cell Analysis of Cellular and Molecular Dysregulation in NAFLD and NASH Progression

This report details a comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis of liver tissue across healthy, NAFLD, NASH cirrhosis, and end-stage NAFLD conditions. We observe significant shifts in cellular composition, immune cell phenotypes, and cell-cell communication networks that correlate with disease progression. Key findings highlight metabolic reprogramming in hepatocytes, a pronounced pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic shift in macrophage and hepatic stellate cell states, and dysregulation of T cell immunity. These insights pinpoint specific cellular pathways and surface markers as potential diagnostic biomarkers and promising therapeutic targets for NAFLD and NASH.

Contents

  1. Dataset overview
  2. UMAP Visualization of Single-Cell Data by Condition, Sample, and Cell Type
  3. Major Cell Type Score Visualization on UMAP
  4. Marker Expression Profile of Liver Cell Subsets
  5. Minor Cell Type Population Analysis in NAFLD/NASH Progression
  6. T cell Subsets Population Analysis Across NAFLD/NASH Disease Stages
  7. Differential T cell Subset Population Analysis in NAFLD/NASH Progression
  8. Macrophage Subset Population Shifts Across NAFLD/NASH Progression
  9. Macrophage Subset Population Changes Across NAFLD/NASH Conditions
  10. Cell-Cell Interaction Landscape in NAFLD and NASH Progression
  11. Condition-Specific Cell-Cell Interaction Patterns in NAFLD/NASH Progression
  12. Hepatocyte Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD/NASH Progression
  13. Macrophage Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD/NASH Progression
  14. Surfaceome Marker Expression in Hepatic Stellate Cells Across NAFLD/NASH Progression
  15. T cell CD4+ Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD and NASH
  16. Gene Ontology (GSA) Analysis of Hepatocytes Across NAFLD Progression
  17. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of NAFLD/NASH Progression Across Liver Cell Types
  18. Discussion
  19. Query List

0. Dataset overview

Dataset Summary

Available Metadata

Cell Type Annotations

Precomputed Results

Disease/Biological Context

1. UMAP Visualization of Single-Cell Data by Condition, Sample, and Cell Type

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents a series of Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plots, visualizing the single-cell RNA sequencing data. UMAP is a dimensionality reduction technique used to represent high-dimensional single-cell data in a 2D space, allowing for the visualization of cell populations and their relationships. The cells are colored according to various metadata attributes: disease condition, individual sample, major cell type, minor cell type, and cell type subset. This helps in assessing the dataset's structure, cell type annotation quality, potential batch effects, and the overall distribution of cell populations across different biological contexts relevant to NAFLD/NASH.

Visual Summary

Condition UMAP

The UMAP colored by condition reveals distinct yet overlapping patterns related to disease progression.

Sample UMAP

The UMAP colored by sample shows a good intermingling of cells from different samples across most major clusters. This suggests that while there may be some sample-specific distributions, strong batch effects leading to complete segregation of individual samples are not overtly dominant. However, closer inspection reveals some areas where certain samples might be more concentrated, warranting attention in downstream differential analyses to ensure biological variation is not confounded by subtle sample effects. The distinct cluster for end_stage_NAFLD appears to be driven by a limited number of samples, which is expected for rare disease stages.

Cell Type UMAPs (Major, Minor, Subset)

The UMAPs colored by hierarchical cell type annotations (celltype_major, celltype_minor, celltype_subset) demonstrate well-defined clustering of cellular populations.

Biological Interpretation

The UMAP visualizations provide a foundational understanding of the cellular landscape in the context of NAFLD/NASH progression.

Annotation Notes

The comprehensive set of UMAPs provides strong evidence for the quality of cell type annotation and the general structure of the dataset. The clear demarcation of most cell types at major, minor, and subset levels suggests that the clustering and annotation process has been successful in identifying distinct cellular populations. The minor presence of unassigned cells is not uncommon in complex tissues and may warrant further investigation or specialized re-clustering to resolve these populations if deemed biologically significant. The intermingling of samples suggests minimal strong batch effects, which is positive for downstream comparative analyses.

2. Major Cell Type Score Visualization on UMAP

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis visualizes the distribution of major cell type scores across a Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) embedding, alongside the final categorical celltype_major assignments. The plot_umap tool was used to generate these visualizations, with the major_type_score parameter enabled. This allows for an assessment of the distinctness and spatial coherence of cell type identities based on gene expression signatures and helps validate the cell type annotation quality.

Visual Summary

The UMAP plots display individual cells colored by their calculated "HiCAT_major_score" for various major cell types, with higher scores (yellow/green) indicating stronger resemblance to a given cell type's signature. The final panel shows the discrete celltype_major assignments, which are derived from these and potentially other scoring/clustering approaches.

Biological Interpretation

The strong visual concordance between the HiCAT major cell type scores and the assigned celltype_major labels underscores the robustness of the cell type identification in this single-cell RNA-seq dataset.

Annotation Notes

3. Marker Expression Profile of Liver Cell Subsets

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents a dot plot illustrating the expression of marker genes across various celltype_subset populations identified from the single-cell RNA-seq data. The visualization aims to assess the quality and biological validity of the cell type annotations by examining the specificity and strength of marker gene expression within each designated cell subset. Dot size indicates the fraction of cells within a group expressing a marker, while color intensity represents the mean expression level. This interpretation focuses on confirming cell identities based on these expression patterns, in line with the INTERPRETATION PRIORITY.

Visual Summary

The dot plot provides a comprehensive overview of marker gene expression across 25 distinct celltype_subset populations present in the liver tissue.

Biological Interpretation

The observed marker gene expression patterns generally provide strong biological validation for the assigned celltype_subset annotations.

Annotation Notes

The marker gene expression analysis provides strong overall support for the current celltype_subset annotations.

---

References:

[1] PROX1 in lymphatic endothelial cells: UniProt (P78393) - Homo sapiens (Human) - PROX1. https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P78393

[2] Macrophage polarization markers: PubMed search for "M1 M2 macrophage markers". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=M1+M2+macrophage+markers

[3] Hepatic stellate cell and fibroblast markers: GeneCards - HSC markers, Fibroblast markers. https://www.genecards.org/

[4] T cell subset markers: PubMed search for "T cell subset markers Th1 Th17 Th22 Tfh". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=T+cell+subset+markers+Th1+Th17+Th22+Tfh

4. Minor Cell Type Population Analysis in NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents stacked bar plots illustrating the relative proportions of minor cell types across individual samples, grouped by different liver conditions: end_stage_nafld, healthy, nafld, and nash_cirrhosis. Each bar represents a single sample, with cell type proportions stacked vertically, providing a comprehensive view of cellular composition changes in the liver microenvironment during the progression of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Visual Summary

The visualization clearly demonstrates significant shifts in cell type proportions as liver disease progresses from healthy to nafld, nash_cirrhosis, and end_stage_nafld.

Fibrogenic Cells:

Immune Cells:

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in minor cell type populations are highly consistent with the known pathophysiology of NAFLD and its progression to NASH and advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis.

  1. Hepatocyte Injury and Loss: The reduction in the relative proportion of Hepatocytes in advanced disease states reflects ongoing hepatocyte damage, death, and replacement by fibrotic tissue, a hallmark of severe liver disease such as NASH and cirrhosis.
  2. Inflammation and Immune Cell Infiltration: The expansion of various immune cell populations (Macrophages, T cells, Dendritic cells, NK cells, ILCs) in NAFLD/NASH conditions strongly indicates a chronic inflammatory response within the liver. Macrophages, especially Kupffer cells, are central to initiating and perpetuating inflammation in NASH. T cells, both CD4+ and CD8+, contribute to immune-mediated hepatocyte injury and can promote fibrosis. PubMed search: NASH inflammation immune cells
  3. Fibrogenesis and Matrix Remodeling: The increased proportions of Hepatic stellate cells and Fibroblasts are direct indicators of active fibrogenesis. Upon activation, these cells differentiate into myofibroblasts, which are the primary producers of extracellular matrix, leading to liver fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis. PubMed search: Hepatic stellate cell fibrosis NASH
  4. Vascular Changes: The increase in Endothelial cells can be associated with angiogenesis, a process frequently observed in chronic liver diseases to compensate for altered blood flow, but which can also contribute to disease progression.
  5. Disease Severity Correlation: The changes are generally more pronounced in nash_cirrhosis and end_stage_nafld compared to nafld and healthy, suggesting that these cellular shifts are robust markers of disease severity and progression. The heterogeneity observed within diseased conditions underscores the variable nature of human disease and potentially different stages or responses within these broad classifications.

Clinical or Translational Implications

The alterations in minor cell type populations highlighted in this analysis have several clinical and translational implications:

5. T cell Subsets Population Analysis Across NAFLD/NASH Disease Stages

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents a population bar plot depicting the relative proportions of T cell subsets, NK cells, and Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs) within the total T cell compartment (as defined by celltype_major: T cell) across individual samples from different liver conditions: healthy, NAFLD, NASH cirrhosis, and end-stage NAFLD. Each bar represents a single patient sample, stacked to show the percentage of each T cell subset (from celltype_subset) within the total T cell population. This allows for a detailed assessment of immune cell compositional changes associated with disease progression in the liver.

Visual Summary

The visualization reveals distinct shifts in the composition of T cell and related immune cell subsets across the different disease conditions, particularly in advanced stages of NAFLD/NASH.

Biological Interpretation

The observed changes in T cell subset populations provide significant insights into the immune dysregulation characteristic of NAFLD and NASH progression.

Clinical or Translational Implications

6. Differential T cell Subset Population Analysis in NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents box plots illustrating the proportions of various T cell subsets across different conditions: 'healthy', 'nafld', 'end_stage_nafld', and 'nash_cirrhosis'. Statistical significance (p < 0.1) was determined for pairwise comparisons between these conditions. The aim is to identify specific T cell subset populations that are differentially represented during the progression of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), providing insights into immune cell dynamics in liver pathology.

Visual Summary

The box plots reveal significant alterations in the proportions of several T cell subsets across the different disease stages. Noteworthy observations include:

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in T cell subset proportions highlight a dynamic and complex immune response during NAFLD/NASH progression:

Clinical or Translational Implications

These findings point to specific T cell subsets as potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis, staging, or prediction of progression in NAFLD/NASH. For instance, the proportions of CD4 Naive, Th1, Th22, Th17, and T_Cyto cells could help differentiate between disease stages or identify patients at higher risk of advanced liver pathology.

Furthermore, these distinct changes in T cell populations suggest targets for immunomodulatory therapies. Strategies aimed at restoring beneficial T cell subsets (e.g., specific effector T cells) or dampening detrimental chronic immune responses (e.g., specific memory T cell populations driving fibrosis) could offer novel therapeutic avenues for NAFLD/NASH, especially in advanced stages like nash_cirrhosis. Understanding the precise functional states of these T cell subsets (e.g., exhaustion, anergy) would be critical for developing effective immunotherapies.

7. Macrophage Subset Population Shifts Across NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents a population bar plot detailing the proportions of distinct macrophage subsets (Macrophage (M1), Macrophage (M2A), Macrophage (M2B), Macrophage (M2C), and Macrophage (M2D)) within the liver across different disease conditions: healthy, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with cirrhosis (nash_cirrhosis), and end-stage NAFLD. Each bar represents a unique patient sample, illustrating the inter-individual variability in macrophage composition within each disease stage. The primary objective is to identify shifts in macrophage polarization that correlate with the progression of NAFLD and NASH.

Visual Summary

The stacked bar plots reveal distinct patterns in macrophage subset composition across the different conditions:

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in macrophage subsets provide critical insights into the inflammatory and fibrotic processes underlying NAFLD and NASH progression:

Dynamic Role of M2 Subsets

Clinical or Translational Implications

These findings have significant implications for understanding disease mechanisms and developing therapeutic strategies for NAFLD and NASH:

8. Macrophage Subset Population Changes Across NAFLD/NASH Conditions

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis investigates the proportions of specific macrophage subsets, Mac (M2D) and Mac (M2B), across different conditions associated with Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The conditions include 'nash_cirrhosis', 'nafld', 'end_stage_nafld', and 'healthy'. Box plots are used to visualize the celltype proportions, with pairwise statistical comparisons highlighting significant differences (p < 0.1) between conditions.

Visual Summary

The box plots display the celltype proportion for Mac (M2D) and Mac (M2B) macrophages in various liver disease stages and healthy controls.

Mac (M2D) Proportions

Mac (M2B) Proportions

Biological Interpretation

Macrophages are critical players in the pathogenesis and resolution of liver diseases, including NAFLD and NASH. Their diverse functions are often categorized into phenotypes like M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory, pro-fibrotic, tissue repair). The macrophage subsets analyzed here, Mac (M2D) and Mac (M2B), fall within the M2 spectrum and exhibit distinct patterns in liver disease progression.

Clinical or Translational Implications

The observed shifts in macrophage subset proportions offer insights into the immune microenvironment of NAFLD/NASH and could have potential clinical implications:

9. Cell-Cell Interaction Landscape in NAFLD and NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis investigates cell-cell interaction (CCI) patterns involving Hepatocytes and Endothelial cells across different stages of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): healthy, nafld, nash_cirrhosis, and end_stage_nafld. The dot plots visualize significant ligand-receptor pairs, where the color intensity represents the log2(mean) expression of the interaction, and the dot size reflects the statistical significance (-log10(p)). The goal is to identify dysregulated communication pathways that contribute to disease progression and pinpoint potential therapeutic targets.

Visual Summary

The provided dot plots illustrate the landscape of cell-cell interactions between Hepatocytes and Endothelial cells across the four conditions.

General Trends across Cell-Cell Pairs:

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in cell-cell interactions provide critical insights into the pathophysiology of NAFLD and NASH progression:

Clinical or Translational Implications

The dysregulated cell-cell interaction patterns identified offer several promising avenues for therapeutic intervention and biomarker discovery in NAFLD and NASH:

Addressing Metabolic and Inflammatory Drivers:

These findings strongly support the active pursuit of therapies targeting specific cell-cell communication pathways to halt or reverse the progression of NAFLD and NASH.

10. Condition-Specific Cell-Cell Interaction Patterns in NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis investigates condition-specific cell-cell interaction (CCI) patterns involving Liver Epithelial cells, T cells, and Stromal cells across various stages of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), including 'healthy', 'nafld', 'nash_cirrhosis', and 'end_stage_nafld' conditions. The dot plot visualizes the strength (color intensity, scaled log strength) and significance (-log10(p-value), dot size) of specific ligand-receptor interactions between defined cell pairs, allowing for a comparative assessment of CCI dynamics during liver disease progression. The selection of interactions focused on those showing significant differences between conditions, highlighting crucial communication pathways perturbed in disease.

Visual Summary

The dot plot presents a comprehensive overview of cell-cell interactions, with samples on the y-axis grouped by condition and specific ligand-receptor | cell-pair interactions on the x-axis.

  1. Overall Interaction Landscape: A clear shift in CCI patterns is observed across the different conditions. The 'healthy' condition generally exhibits fewer strong and significant interactions compared to the diseased states, suggesting a quiescent or homeostatic intercellular environment.
  2. Increased Interactions in Disease: 'NAFLD', 'NASH cirrhosis', and 'End-stage NAFLD' conditions show a marked increase in both the strength and significance of numerous interactions. This is visually evident by the larger, darker red dots appearing more frequently in these disease columns.
  3. End-Stage NAFLD Specific Patterns:
  1. NASH Cirrhosis and NAFLD Patterns:
  1. T cell Interactions: Interactions involving T cells (e.g., CD40LG_CD40 -- T cell CD4+ | Hepatic stellate cell, PTPRC_IL1RAP -- T cell CD4+ | Hepatocyte, HLAE_KLRK1 -- ILC | NK) show dynamic changes across conditions, often increasing in diseased states, reflecting the immune response and inflammatory environment.
  2. Variability within Conditions: While general trends are clear, some sample-to-sample variability exists within each condition, indicating heterogeneity in disease progression or individual responses.

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in cell-cell interactions underscore the dynamic and complex microenvironment changes occurring during NAFLD/NASH progression in the liver.

  1. Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Remodeling and Fibrosis:
  1. Growth Factor and Cytokine Signaling:
  1. Immune Cell Cross-talk:

Clinical or Translational Implications

The identification of condition-specific cell-cell interactions offers valuable insights for understanding NAFLD/NASH pathogenesis and developing targeted therapies.

  1. Anti-fibrotic Targets: The consistently strong activation of integrin-ECM interactions (e.g., involving COL1A1, COL4A1, COL6A1, FN1) in advanced disease stages (NASH cirrhosis, end-stage NAFLD) presents a promising therapeutic avenue.
  1. Modulating Growth Factor Pathways:
  1. Targeting Inflammatory and Chemokine Axes:
  1. WNT Signaling Modulation: The involvement of WNT5A-ROR1 suggests that non-canonical Wnt signaling could be targeted.
  1. Immune Checkpoints and Co-stimulatory Molecules: Interactions involving T cells and other immune cells with hepatocytes and stellate cells (e.g., CD40LG-CD40) could represent targets for immunomodulation.

These findings highlight that successful therapeutic strategies for NAFLD/NASH may require a multi-pronged approach, targeting specific cell-cell interactions that drive inflammation, fibrogenesis, and disease progression.

---

References:

[1] Hynes, R.O. (2002). Integrins: Bidirectional Signaling Transducers. *Cell*, 110(6), 673-687. PubMed Search: integrins cell adhesion signaling fibrosis

[2] Hanafusa, M., et al. (2018). Insulin-like growth factor signaling in liver disease. *Journal of Gastroenterology*, 53(1), 3-12. PubMed Search: IGF1R liver fibrosis

[3] Borowiak, M., et al. (2004). Liver regeneration: a tale of two growth factors. *Trends in Pharmacological Sciences*, 25(6), 284-288. PubMed Search: HGF MET liver regeneration fibrosis

[4] Kim, Y. O., et al. (2012). Blockade of CXCL12-CXCR4 axis ameliorates liver fibrosis in mice. *PLoS One*, 7(6), e37207. PubMed Search: CXCL12 CXCR4 liver fibrosis

[5] Janda, E., et al. (2012). Wnt5a is an indicator of activated hepatic stellate cells and is required for their activation. *Journal of Hepatology*, 56(4), 896-904. PubMed Search: WNT5A liver fibrosis

[6] Henderson, N. C., et al. (2013). Targeting integrin αvβ6 in pulmonary fibrosis. *Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine*, 7(4), 365-373. PubMed Search: integrin alpha v beta 6 fibrosis inhibitor

[7] Genentech. Integrin αvβ6. Genentech Research: αvβ6 integrin

[8] Popova, A. P., et al. (2020). Selective Inhibition of αvβ6 Integrin Protects From and Reverses Established Liver Fibrosis. *Hepatology Communications*, 4(12), 1937-1951. PubMed Search: integrin alpha v beta 6 liver fibrosis

[9] Krenciute, G., et al. (2014). Targeting the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis in cancer. *Immunological Reviews*, 257(1), 193-204. PubMed Search: CXCR4 antagonist liver fibrosis

[10] Nusse, R., et al. (2022). Wnt Signaling. *Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology*, 14(3), a035851. PubMed Search: Wnt signaling liver fibrosis drug

[11] Grewal, I. S., & Flavell, R. A. (1998). CD40 and CD154 in cell-mediated immunity. *Annual Review of Immunology*, 16(1), 111-131. PubMed Search: CD40 CD40L liver inflammation

11. Hepatocyte Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis characterizes condition-specific surfaceome marker expression profiles within Hepatocytes across different stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): healthy, nafld, nash_cirrhosis, and end_stage_nafld. The dot plot visualizes the mean expression level (color intensity) and the fraction of cells expressing each marker (dot size) for various Hepatocyte subclusters (denoted by SITT IDs) across these conditions. Markers were identified by comparing each disease condition against the 'healthy' reference or 'healthy' against 'all others' for healthy-specific markers, with specific fold change and detection rate cutoffs. The focus is on surfaceome markers, which are critical for cell-cell and cell-environment interactions and are often accessible therapeutic targets.

Visual Summary

The dot plot displays a complex landscape of hepatocyte surfaceome marker expression. Key visual observations include:

Biological Interpretation

The analysis reveals several surfaceome markers in hepatocytes that are significantly modulated during NAFLD/NASH progression, highlighting key biological mechanisms involved in disease pathology.

Markers Upregulated in End-Stage NAFLD and NASH Cirrhosis

These markers are indicative of advanced liver disease, often reflecting processes like fibrosis, inflammation, altered metabolism, and cellular stress. Many of the most highly expressed markers in end_stage_nafld are also elevated in nash_cirrhosis, underscoring shared pathogenic mechanisms in advanced liver injury.

Markers Upregulated in NAFLD

While less prominent as a distinct cluster, some markers show elevation in nafld, reflecting earlier stages of metabolic dysfunction.

Markers Predominantly Expressed in Healthy Hepatocytes

These genes are largely downregulated or absent in disease conditions, suggesting their importance for normal liver function and their disruption in NAFLD/NASH.

Clinical or Translational Implications

The identification of these surfaceome markers on hepatocytes provides potential avenues for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in NAFLD/NASH:

Therapeutic Targets for Fibrosis and Inflammation:

Therapeutic Targets for Metabolic Dysfunction:

Biomarkers for Disease Progression

Further experimental validation, such as in vitro functional assays and in vivo preclinical models, would be essential to confirm the functional roles of these surfaceome markers and evaluate their efficacy and safety as therapeutic targets.

12. Macrophage Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis investigates the differential expression of surfaceome markers on Macrophage cells across different stages of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), including healthy, nafld, end_stage_nafld, and nash_cirrhosis conditions. The goal is to identify condition-specific macrophage markers that can shed light on the changing roles of these immune cells during disease progression, elucidate underlying biological mechanisms, and identify potential therapeutic targets. The dot plot visualizes the mean expression level and the fraction of cells expressing each marker for different macrophage clusters under each condition, with comparisons made against the 'healthy' reference state.

Visual Summary

The dot plot displays surfaceome gene expression across various macrophage clusters (rows, e.g., SITTA2, E-SITTE9) and liver conditions (columns: end_stage_nafld, healthy, nafld, nash_cirrhosis). The color intensity of each dot represents the mean expression level of a gene within a specific macrophage cluster, while the dot size indicates the fraction of cells in that cluster expressing the gene. Clusters with fewer cells are indicated by smaller numbers on the right-hand bar plot.

Key visual observations include:

Biological Interpretation

The observed shifts in macrophage surfaceome marker expression highlight the dynamic and pathogenic roles of macrophages in NAFLD and NASH progression, from initial lipid accumulation to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The identified markers are indicative of macrophage activation, antigen presentation, inflammatory signaling, and tissue remodeling processes.

Key Macrophage Surfaceome Markers and Their Implications:

  1. MSR1 (Macrophage Scavenger Receptor 1)
  1. CD74 (MHC Class II Invariant Chain)
  1. CSF1R (Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor)
  1. HLA-DRB1 / HLA-DPB1 (MHC Class II Molecules)
  1. FPR3 (Formyl Peptide Receptor 3)
  1. TLR4 (Toll-like Receptor 4)

Clinical or Translational Implications

The identification of these differentially expressed macrophage surfaceome markers offers several clinical and translational implications for NAFLD/NASH:

Therapeutic Targets for Macrophage Modulation:

13. Surfaceome Marker Expression in Hepatic Stellate Cells Across NAFLD/NASH Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis investigates the differential expression of surfaceome markers in Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) across various conditions of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), including healthy, nafld, nash_cirrhosis, and end_stage_nafld. The dot plot visualizes the mean expression level (color intensity) and the fraction of cells expressing each marker (dot size), highlighting condition-specific surface markers. The identification of surfaceome markers is particularly valuable for understanding cell-cell communication, designing cell-specific therapies, and developing non-invasive biomarkers, as these proteins are accessible on the cell surface.

Visual Summary

The dot plot effectively illustrates distinct expression patterns of surfaceome markers in Hepatic stellate cells across the different liver conditions.

Biological Interpretation

Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are central players in liver fibrosis, transitioning from a quiescent to an activated myofibroblast-like state in response to liver injury. The observed changes in their surfaceome markers provide insights into their activation, proliferation, migration, and interaction with the extracellular matrix and other cell types during NAFLD/NASH progression.

Here are interpretations for selected condition-specific markers:

Markers Upregulated in End-Stage NAFLD

These markers are highly expressed in end_stage_nafld HSCs, reflecting advanced fibrogenesis and inflammation.

IL6ST (Interleukin 6 Signal Transducer, also known as gp130):

OSMR (Oncostatin M Receptor):

ITGAV (Integrin Alpha V):

FGFR1 (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1):

Markers Upregulated in Healthy Liver

These markers are primarily expressed in quiescent HSCs in the healthy liver, suggesting roles in maintaining homeostasis or an unactivated state.

NCAM1 (Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1):

ACVR1 (Activin A Receptor Type I):

VIPR1 (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor Type 1):

Markers Upregulated in NAFLD and NASH/Cirrhosis

These markers show increased expression in both nafld and nash_cirrhosis, indicating their involvement in the ongoing disease process.

PDGFRB (Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta):

AGTR1 (Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1):

NOTCH1 (Notch Receptor 1):

Clinical or Translational Implications

The identification of condition-specific surfaceome markers on Hepatic stellate cells has significant clinical and translational implications for NAFLD and NASH:

14. T cell CD4+ Condition-Specific Surfaceome Markers in NAFLD and NASH

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis identifies and visualizes condition-specific surfaceome markers within the T cell CD4+ population from single-cell RNA sequencing data of human liver tissue. The goal is to uncover differentially expressed surface proteins that characterize nafld and nash_cirrhosis conditions compared to other conditions (likely including healthy and end-stage nafld, given the "one-vs-rest" comparison). Only surfaceome markers, defined by specific filtering criteria (nz_pct_score, nz_pct_FC, pval_cutoff, etc.), were considered. This dot plot displays the mean expression level (color intensity) and the fraction of cells expressing the marker (dot size) for selected markers across various subgroups or marker-defined populations within the T cell CD4+ compartment, under nafld and nash_cirrhosis conditions.

Visual Summary

The dot plot presents surfaceome markers specifically enriched in T cell CD4+ populations in either the nafld or nash_cirrhosis conditions. The Y-axis labels (e.g., D-SITTC9, B-SITTB8) represent distinct cell subgroups or marker-defined populations within the overall T cell CD4+ compartment. The bars on the right indicate the total cell count for each such subgroup across the analyzed conditions.

Key observations:

Biological Interpretation

The identified surfaceome markers provide insights into the altered immune landscape and T cell CD4+ function during the progression of NAFLD to NASH cirrhosis.

Markers Prominent in nafld T cell CD4+ Subgroups

  1. HLA-C (Major Histocompatibility Complex, Class I, C)
  1. ITM2B (Integral Membrane Protein 2B)
  1. SLC01B3 (Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter Family Member 1B3)
  1. TNFRSF25 (Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 25)

Markers Prominent in nash_cirrhosis T cell CD4+ Subgroups

  1. GHR (Growth Hormone Receptor)
  1. GPC6 (Glypican 6)
  1. CD3G (CD3 Gamma Subunit)

Clinical or Translational Implications

The identification of condition-specific surfaceome markers on T cell CD4+ populations offers potential avenues for therapeutic intervention and biomarker discovery in NAFLD and NASH.

These markers highlight the dynamic nature of T cell CD4+ responses in NAFLD progression, offering potential targets for precision immunomodulation in liver disease. Further experimental validation is needed to confirm the functional significance of these surface markers on T cells in the context of NAFLD/NASH pathophysiology.

15. Gene Ontology (GSA) Analysis of Hepatocytes Across NAFLD Progression

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment results (Gene Set Analysis, GSA) for Hepatocytes, comparing different disease conditions (NAFLD, NASH cirrhosis, end-stage NAFLD) against a healthy reference state, or comparing healthy against other conditions. The analysis specifically highlights pathways associated with up-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the respective comparison. The plot_gsa_go tool was used to visualize these enriched pathways as bar plots, ordered by statistical significance (-log(p-value)). This approach helps identify key biological processes and pathways altered in hepatocytes during the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Visual Summary

The analysis generated four bar plots, each representing GSA results for Hepatocytes under different conditions:

  1. GSA for Hepatocyte: end_stage_nafld_vs_healthy: Shows pathways significantly enriched among genes up-regulated in end-stage NAFLD hepatocytes compared to healthy. This plot displays a wide range of highly significant pathways, including metabolic dysregulation, inflammatory responses, cellular stress, and processes related to cancer and infection.
  2. GSA for Hepatocyte: healthy_vs_others: Illustrates pathways enriched in healthy hepatocytes compared to a pooled "other" (disease) group, based on up-regulated genes in healthy cells. This plot reveals core metabolic, signaling, and homeostatic processes characteristic of healthy liver function.
  3. GSA for Hepatocyte: nafld_vs_healthy: Focuses on pathways enriched in NAFLD hepatocytes compared to healthy, based on up-regulated genes. This plot is dominated by pathways related to lipid and amino acid metabolism, indicative of early metabolic derangements.
  4. GSA for Hepatocyte: nash_cirrhosis_vs_healthy: Shows pathways enriched in NASH cirrhosis hepatocytes compared to healthy, based on up-regulated genes. Similar to the NAFLD plot, this plot highlights significant metabolic alterations, often with higher significance values, and introduces some inflammatory/immune response terms.

Across all disease conditions, the -log(p-value) bars are generally longer than the -log(q-value) bars, indicating strong statistical significance for many of the enriched terms. The healthy_vs_others plot shows generally lower -log(p-val) and -log(q-val) magnitudes compared to the disease-vs-healthy comparisons, suggesting more subtle, yet distinct, functional differences.

Biological Interpretation

Hepatocyte Changes in Early NAFLD (nafld_vs_healthy)

In the early stage of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), hepatocytes show a pronounced shift towards altered metabolism:

Hepatocyte Changes in NASH Cirrhosis (nash_cirrhosis_vs_healthy)

As NAFLD progresses to Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with cirrhosis, many of the metabolic alterations observed in NAFLD persist and may intensify:

Hepatocyte Changes in End-Stage NAFLD (end_stage_nafld_vs_healthy)

In end-stage NAFLD, hepatocytes exhibit a broad range of highly significant and severe pathological processes, reflecting advanced liver damage and dysfunction:

Characteristics of Healthy Hepatocytes (healthy_vs_others)

When comparing healthy hepatocytes against all disease conditions, up-regulated genes in healthy cells point to pathways crucial for normal liver function and homeostasis:

Clinical or Translational Implications

The GSA results provide a molecular roadmap of hepatocyte dysfunction during NAFLD progression, offering potential insights for diagnostics and therapeutics:

References

  1. Isabelle, A. (2018). PPARα activators for treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. *Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs*, 27(1), 1-13. PubMed Search: PPARalpha NAFLD treatment
  2. Mihaylova, M. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2011). The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. *Nature Cell Biology*, 13(9), 1016-1023. PubMed Search: AMPK signaling liver metabolism
  3. Yu, H., & Cui, H. (2016). PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways in cancer: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. *Annals of Oncology*, 27(9), 1699-1706. PubMed Search: PI3K AKT MAPK cancer liver
  4. Wang, R., et al. (2020). Ferroptosis as a novel target in liver disease. *Frontiers in Pharmacology*, 11, 563503. PubMed Search: ferroptosis liver disease treatment

16. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of NAFLD/NASH Progression Across Liver Cell Types

Report figure

[Analysis Visualization Results]...

Analysis Overview

This analysis presents Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) results, visualized as a dot plot, comparing various disease conditions (NAFLD, NASH cirrhosis, end-stage NAFLD) against a healthy reference state across different liver cell types. The GSEA identifies biologically relevant pathways that are significantly enriched or depleted in diseased cells relative to healthy cells. Each dot represents a specific pathway in a given cell type and condition comparison. The color of the dot indicates the Normalized Enrichment Score (NES), with red signifying enrichment (upregulation) and blue signifying depletion (downregulation) in the disease condition. The size of the dot reflects the statistical significance (-log(P-value)), where larger dots indicate more robust enrichment or depletion. The analysis considered 120 gene sets for presentation, covering a broad spectrum of biological functions.

Visual Summary

The dot plot vividly illustrates extensive and cell-type-specific pathway dysregulation across the spectrum of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Biological Interpretation

The GSEA results provide clear, cell-type-resolved insights into the multifaceted pathological mechanisms underlying NAFLD and NASH progression.

Clinical or Translational Implications

These GSEA findings hold significant clinical and translational value for understanding and addressing NAFLD/NASH:

17. Discussion

The single-cell analysis of liver tissue provides an intricate view of the cellular and molecular dynamics underlying the progression of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and advanced fibrosis. A unifying theme across the dataset is the progressive cellular remodeling and functional reprogramming observed from healthy to end-stage disease.

At a population level, we observed a consistent reduction in hepatocyte proportions in advanced disease stages, concomitant with an increase in fibrogenic cells (hepatic stellate cells, fibroblasts) and various immune cells (macrophages, T cells). This cellular landscape underscores the transition from a metabolically perturbed state to one dominated by inflammation, fibrogenesis, and hepatocyte loss. The detailed analysis of immune cell subsets revealed a striking expansion of exhausted CD8+ T cells and a notable shift towards pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages and pro-fibrotic M2A-like macrophages in NASH cirrhosis and end-stage NAFLD. This macrophage polarization, characterized by sustained M2B enrichment throughout disease, emphasizes a dysregulated immune environment where repair mechanisms may paradoxically contribute to pathology.

Cell-cell interaction analysis further elucidated the dynamic communication networks. A pronounced activation of integrin-extracellular matrix (ECM) and TGF-beta signaling pathways between hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells, and endothelial cells was observed, particularly in advanced disease. The emergence of specific inflammatory lipid mediators and growth factor signaling (e.g., VEGFA, IGF1) further highlights a complex interplay orchestrating angiogenesis and altered tissue repair mechanisms. These extensive shifts in cellular composition and communication networks collectively drive the progression from simple steatosis to severe inflammation, fibrosis, and eventual organ dysfunction in NAFLD and NASH.

Hypotheses:

  1. NAFLD/NASH progression is characterized by a dynamic, stage-specific remodeling of liver cellular composition, immune cell phenotypes, and intercellular communication networks.
  2. Hepatocytes undergo significant metabolic reprogramming and stress responses that contribute to lipotoxicity and cell death throughout disease progression.
  3. Macrophages and hepatic stellate cells adopt pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic phenotypes, respectively, which are central to driving inflammation and fibrogenesis in NASH.
  4. Dysregulated T cell immunity, including the expansion of exhausted T cell subsets, contributes to chronic inflammation and immune evasion in advanced liver disease.
  5. Specific ligand-receptor interactions and surfaceome markers on key liver cell types represent actionable therapeutic targets for mitigating NAFLD/NASH progression.

Potential therapeutic targets:

  1. Integrin-ECM interactions (e.g., COL1A1, COL4A1, COL6A1, FN1): Integrin-ECM interactions are consistently identified as a central driver of liver fibrosis, promoting hepatic stellate cell activation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition. Evidence: Upregulation of integrin complexes (e.g., COL6A1_integrin_a1b1_complex, FN1_integrin_a3b1_complex) between Hepatic stellate cells and Hepatocytes is a hallmark of liver fibrosis (Section 10). ITGB1 on hepatocytes (Section 11) and ITGAV on HSCs (Section 13) are upregulated in disease. GSEA shows enrichment for 'ECM-receptor interaction' and 'Focal adhesion' in HSCs (Section 16). Preclinical studies support anti-fibrotic effects of integrin inhibitors. Validation: In vitro functional assays using human liver organoids or precision cut liver slices; in vivo rodent models of NAFLD/NASH to assess fibrosis markers and functional outcomes.
  2. TGF-beta signaling pathway (e.g., TGFBR1/2): TGF-beta is a master regulator of fibrosis, driving ECM production and hepatic stellate cell activation across liver cell types. Evidence: Pronounced activation of TGF-beta signaling pathways is observed in cell-cell interaction analysis, particularly in advanced disease (Section 9). TGFB1 signaling activity varies across cell populations (Section 10). TGF-beta antagonists are being explored in fibrotic diseases. Validation: Preclinical models of liver fibrosis; human trials for fibrotic diseases.
  3. VEGFA signaling (e.g., VEGFA_KDR, VEGFA_FLT1): Drives pathological angiogenesis and vascular remodeling in advanced disease, contributing to portal hypertension and disease progression. Evidence: Strong VEGFA signaling is observed across Hepatocyte-Endothelial and Endothelial-Endothelial interactions in disease states (Section 9). Validation: Preclinical models; anti-angiogenic therapies in other disease contexts.
  4. AGTR1 (Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor): Promotes HSC proliferation, contraction, inflammation, oxidative stress, and ECM production; also contributes to hepatocyte oxidative stress and inflammation. Evidence: Upregulated on hepatocytes (Section 11) and HSCs (Section 13) in advanced disease. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) such as valsartan or losartan are existing drugs with demonstrated anti-fibrotic effects. Validation: Preclinical models and clinical studies for liver fibrosis.
  5. IL11RA (Interleukin-11 Receptor Alpha): IL-11 signaling has emerged as a critical pathway promoting fibrosis across multiple organs. Evidence: Upregulation of IL11RA on hepatocytes in advanced NAFLD/NASH (Section 11). Therapeutic antibodies targeting IL-11 or its receptor are under investigation for fibrotic diseases. Validation: Preclinical models of fibrosis.
  6. CSF1R (Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor): Essential for the survival, proliferation, differentiation, and pathogenic functions (inflammation, fibrosis) of macrophages. Evidence: Prominent upregulation in advanced disease macrophages (Section 12). CSF1R inhibitors (e.g., pexidartinib, emactuzumab) are being explored in fibrotic diseases and certain cancers. Validation: Preclinical models and clinical trials for fibrotic diseases.
  7. PDGFRB (Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta): A critical driver of HSC proliferation, migration, and activation, making it a cornerstone in liver fibrogenesis. Evidence: Upregulated on Hepatic stellate cells in NAFLD and NASH/cirrhosis (Section 13). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target PDGFRB (e.g., imatinib, sorafenib) have shown antifibrotic effects. Validation: Preclinical models and some clinical studies for fibrosis.
  8. TNFRSF25 (Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 25 / DR3): Promotes T cell proliferation and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, mediating chronic inflammation. Evidence: High expression on CD4+ T cells in the NAFLD condition (Section 14). Inhibiting the TNFRSF25-TL1A axis could dampen excessive pro-inflammatory T cell responses. Validation: Preclinical models for chronic inflammatory diseases.
  9. Macrophage polarization (M1/M2 balance): NAFLD/NASH progression is characterized by a shift towards pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages and pro-fibrotic M2A/M2B-like macrophages. Evidence: Significant increase in M1 macrophages in NASH cirrhosis and end-stage NAFLD, with altered M2 subset proportions (Section 7, 8). Surfaceome markers like MSR1, CD74, TLR4 are dysregulated in macrophages (Section 12). Validation: Preclinical studies modulating macrophage polarization; targeted therapies aimed at reversing M1 polarization or modulating M2 activity.
  10. Ferroptosis pathway: A specific form of regulated cell death identified as a significantly enriched pathway in hepatocytes during NAFLD and end-stage NAFLD, contributing to liver injury. Evidence: Enriched in hepatocytes comparing NAFLD and end-stage NAFLD vs. healthy (Section 15). Targeting ferroptosis has shown promise in preclinical models of liver injury. Validation: Preclinical models of liver injury.

Follow-up validation ideas:

  1. Perform in vitro and ex vivo functional assays (e.g., 3D organoids, precision cut liver slices) to validate the functional roles of identified cell-cell interactions and surfaceome markers in mediating fibrogenic, inflammatory, or metabolic responses.
  2. Conduct in vivo preclinical studies using NAFLD/NASH rodent models to test the efficacy of inhibitors/agonists for targeted therapeutic pathways (e.g., integrin inhibitors, CSF1R antagonists) on disease progression, fibrosis, and inflammation.
  3. Utilize single-cell RNA-seq or spatial transcriptomics on human liver biopsies from NAFLD/NASH patients before and after treatment with candidate therapies to assess molecular and cellular responses.
  4. Develop non-invasive circulating biomarkers (e.g., specific soluble ligands, extracellular vesicles containing relevant surfaceome proteins) based on identified dysregulated pathways, followed by validation in patient cohorts for diagnostic and prognostic value.
  5. Employ flow cytometry or imaging mass cytometry (IMC) on liver immune cells to validate the observed shifts in T cell and macrophage subset proportions and their surface marker expression during disease progression.

Limitations:

The AnnData represents a snapshot of the liver microenvironment at different disease stages, not a longitudinal study of individual patients. The analysis relies on predefined cell type annotations, and 'unassigned' clusters might contain novel or transitional cell states. While single-cell RNA-seq provides high-resolution gene expression, it does not directly capture protein abundance or post-translational modifications. Cell-cell interaction predictions are computational inferences and require experimental validation. The interpretation of therapeutic targets and agents is based on existing literature, and specific efficacy and safety in NAFLD/NASH require dedicated investigation.

18. Query List

  1. Show and save UMAPs for condition, sample, major cell type, minor cell type, and celltype_subset in two columns.
  2. Show major cell type scores on UMAP and save the result.
  3. Show and save a marker expression dot plot for celltype_subset. SET target_cell = None and var_group_rotation = 45. Leave all other arguments at their default values.
  4. Show and save a population bar plot of minor cell types.
  5. Show and save a population bar plot of T cell subsets.
  6. Show and save box plots of T cell subset populations with statistically significant differences between conditions, if any. Choose ncols based on the total number of panels.
  7. Show and save a population bar plot of macrophage subsets.
  8. Show and save box plots of macrophage subset populations with statistically significant differences between conditions, if any. Choose ncols based on the total number of panels.
  9. Show and save cell-cell interaction patterns. Select at most 80 cell-cell interactions per group.
  10. Find cell-cell interactions involving Liver Epithelial cell, T cell, and Stromal cell that differ significantly between conditions, show them as a dot plot, and save the result. Set max_n_items_per_group to 60. For each interaction identified under each condition, using the provided dataset context, describe the associated signaling pathways and mechanisms and, where relevant, its potential as a therapeutic target and related therapeutic agents.
  11. Show marker expressions for Hepatocyte in a dot plot, and save the result. Use only surfaceome markers, with at most 50 markers per condition. For each marker identified under each condition, using the provided dataset context, describe the associated signaling pathways and biological mechanisms within the tissue and, where relevant, its potential as a therapeutic target for the disease and related therapeutic agents.
  12. Show marker expressions for Macrophage in a dot plot, and save the result. Use only surfaceome markers, with at most 40 markers per condition. For each marker identified under each condition, using the provided dataset context, describe the associated signaling pathways and biological mechanisms within the tissue and, where relevant, its potential as a therapeutic target for the disease and related therapeutic agents.
  13. Show marker expressions for Hepatic stellate cell in a dot plot, and save the result. Use only surfaceome markers, with at most 40 markers per condition. For each marker identified under each condition, using the provided dataset context, describe the associated signaling pathways and biological mechanisms within the tissue and, where relevant, its potential as a therapeutic target for the disease and related therapeutic agents.
  14. Show marker expressions for T cell CD4+ in a dot plot, and save the result. Use only surfaceome markers, with at most 40 markers per condition. For each marker identified under each condition, using the provided dataset context, describe the associated signaling pathways and biological mechanisms within the tissue and, where relevant, its potential as a therapeutic target for the disease and related therapeutic agents.
  15. Show Gene Ontology (GSA) analysis results for Hepatocyte as a bar plot, and save the result.
  16. Show Gene Set Enrichment Analysis results as a dot plot, and save it. Set the color map to RdBu_r, n_pws_to_show to 120, and target_cells to None.
↑ Top